EdenteV2, Main, Exploration, bibRecord, 006A65

Bone density assessments of oral implant sites using computerized tomography

Identifieur interne : 006A65 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 006A64; suivant : 006A66

Bone density assessments of oral implant sites using computerized tomography

Auteurs : I. Turkyilmaz [Turquie] ; T. F. Tözüm [Turquie] ; C. Tumer [Turquie]

Source :

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 2007-04.

RBID : ISTEX:C9397B25AB311A5844B3B5304C7E3CE5D78AC79E

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Anterior mandible, Anterior maxilla, Blackwell publishing, Bone density, Bone density assessments, Bone density value, Bone density values, Bone mineral density, Bone quality, Clin, Computerized, Computerized tomography, Hacettepe university, Implant, Implant placement, Implant sites, Interest areas, Journal compilation, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular overdentures, Maxilla, Maxillofac, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral rehabil, Posterior mandible, Posterior maxilla, Present study, Previous studies, Rehabil, Strong correlation, Tomography, Valuable information.
Teeft :
- Anterior mandible, Anterior maxilla, Blackwell publishing, Bone density, Bone density assessments, Bone density value, Bone density values, Bone mineral density, Bone quality, Clin, Computerized, Computerized tomography, Hacettepe university, Implant, Implant placement, Implant sites, Interest areas, Journal compilation, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular overdentures, Maxilla, Maxillofac, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral rehabil, Posterior mandible, Posterior maxilla, Present study, Previous studies, Rehabil, Strong correlation, Tomography, Valuable information.

Abstract

summary The type and architecture of bone are considered to affect its load‐bearing capacity and it has been indicated that poorer quality bone is associated with higher implant failure rates. To date, bone classifications have only provided subjective methods for pre‐operative assessment, which can be considered unreliable. The aim of this study was to evaluate variations of the bone density in designated endosseous implant sites using computerized tomography. One hundred and thirty‐one designated implant sites in 72 patients were utilized. Computerized tomography results indicated that bone densities may vary markedly when different areas of a designated implant site are compared. It has been observed that a difference in the bone density exists for the four regions within the oral area, with the anterior mandible yielding mean density values of 944·9 ± 207 Hounsfield units (HU) > anterior maxilla, 715·8 ± 190 HU > posterior mandible, 674·3 ± 227 HU > posterior maxilla and 455·1 ± 122 HU. Computerized tomography may be a useful tool for determining the bone density of interest areas before implant placement, and this valuable information about the bone quality provides dental practitioners to make better treatment planning regarding the implant positions.

Url:

https://api.istex.fr/document/C9397B25AB311A5844B3B5304C7E3CE5D78AC79E/fulltext/pdf

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01689.x

Affiliations:

Turquie

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 006404
to stream Istex, to step Curation: 006404
to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 002A15
to stream Main, to step Merge: 006B73
to stream Main, to step Curation: 006A65

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Bone density assessments of oral implant sites using computerized tomography</title>
<author><name sortKey="Turkyilmaz, I" sort="Turkyilmaz, I" uniqKey="Turkyilmaz I" first="I." last="Turkyilmaz">I. Turkyilmaz</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Tozum, T F" sort="Tozum, T F" uniqKey="Tozum T" first="T. F." last="Tözüm">T. F. Tözüm</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Tumer, C" sort="Tumer, C" uniqKey="Tumer C" first="C." last="Tumer">C. Tumer</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:C9397B25AB311A5844B3B5304C7E3CE5D78AC79E</idno>
<date when="2007" year="2007">2007</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01689.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/C9397B25AB311A5844B3B5304C7E3CE5D78AC79E/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006404</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006404</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">006404</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">002A15</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">002A15</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0305-182X:2007:Turkyilmaz I:bone:density:assessments</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">006B73</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">006A65</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">006A65</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Bone density assessments of oral implant sites using computerized tomography</title>
<author><name sortKey="Turkyilmaz, I" sort="Turkyilmaz, I" uniqKey="Turkyilmaz I" first="I." last="Turkyilmaz">I. Turkyilmaz</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Turquie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Ankara</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Tozum, T F" sort="Tozum, T F" uniqKey="Tozum T" first="T. F." last="Tözüm">T. F. Tözüm</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Turquie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Ankara</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Tumer, C" sort="Tumer, C" uniqKey="Tumer C" first="C." last="Tumer">C. Tumer</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Turquie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Ankara</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">34</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="267">267</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="272">272</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2007-04">2007-04</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Anterior mandible</term>
<term>Anterior maxilla</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Bone density</term>
<term>Bone density assessments</term>
<term>Bone density value</term>
<term>Bone density values</term>
<term>Bone mineral density</term>
<term>Bone quality</term>
<term>Clin</term>
<term>Computerized</term>
<term>Computerized tomography</term>
<term>Hacettepe university</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Implant sites</term>
<term>Interest areas</term>
<term>Journal compilation</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibular overdentures</term>
<term>Maxilla</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral rehabil</term>
<term>Posterior mandible</term>
<term>Posterior maxilla</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Previous studies</term>
<term>Rehabil</term>
<term>Strong correlation</term>
<term>Tomography</term>
<term>Valuable information</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Anterior mandible</term>
<term>Anterior maxilla</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Bone density</term>
<term>Bone density assessments</term>
<term>Bone density value</term>
<term>Bone density values</term>
<term>Bone mineral density</term>
<term>Bone quality</term>
<term>Clin</term>
<term>Computerized</term>
<term>Computerized tomography</term>
<term>Hacettepe university</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Implant sites</term>
<term>Interest areas</term>
<term>Journal compilation</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibular overdentures</term>
<term>Maxilla</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral rehabil</term>
<term>Posterior mandible</term>
<term>Posterior maxilla</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Previous studies</term>
<term>Rehabil</term>
<term>Strong correlation</term>
<term>Tomography</term>
<term>Valuable information</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">summary  The type and architecture of bone are considered to affect its load‐bearing capacity and it has been indicated that poorer quality bone is associated with higher implant failure rates. To date, bone classifications have only provided subjective methods for pre‐operative assessment, which can be considered unreliable. The aim of this study was to evaluate variations of the bone density in designated endosseous implant sites using computerized tomography. One hundred and thirty‐one designated implant sites in 72 patients were utilized. Computerized tomography results indicated that bone densities may vary markedly when different areas of a designated implant site are compared. It has been observed that a difference in the bone density exists for the four regions within the oral area, with the anterior mandible yielding mean density values of 944·9 ± 207 Hounsfield units (HU) > anterior maxilla, 715·8 ± 190 HU > posterior mandible, 674·3 ± 227 HU > posterior maxilla and 455·1 ± 122 HU. Computerized tomography may be a useful tool for determining the bone density of interest areas before implant placement, and this valuable information about the bone quality provides dental practitioners to make better treatment planning regarding the implant positions.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations><list><country><li>Turquie</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree><country name="Turquie"><noRegion><name sortKey="Turkyilmaz, I" sort="Turkyilmaz, I" uniqKey="Turkyilmaz I" first="I." last="Turkyilmaz">I. Turkyilmaz</name>
</noRegion>
<name sortKey="Tozum, T F" sort="Tozum, T F" uniqKey="Tozum T" first="T. F." last="Tözüm">T. F. Tözüm</name>
<name sortKey="Tumer, C" sort="Tumer, C" uniqKey="Tumer C" first="C." last="Tumer">C. Tumer</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006A65 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 006A65 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:C9397B25AB311A5844B3B5304C7E3CE5D78AC79E
   |texte=   Bone density assessments of oral implant sites using computerized tomography
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Bone density assessments of oral implant sites using computerized tomography

Bone density assessments of oral implant sites using computerized tomography

Source :

English descriptors

Abstract

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri